Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Graphics 540

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

2014Core: 628 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Graphics 540

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Graphics 540 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 760A
0.5 GB 55
1,226
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 630
brand logoGeForce GT 445M
brand logoGeForce GT 645M
brand logoGeForce GT 745M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU
Iris Graphics 540
Shared System RAM 15
1,270
+3.6%
brand logoArc Graphics 130T
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Graphics 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760A

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Graphics 540 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 760A is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

Iris Graphics 540

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Graphics 540 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (1,270 vs 1,226), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Graphics 540 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Graphics 540 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

Intel

Iris Graphics 540

The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the Iris Graphics 540 reaches 1,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the Iris Graphics 540 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 540). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AIris Graphics 540
G3D Mark Score
1,226
1,270+4%
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
768+100%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.009 TFLOPS+31%
0.768 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1000 MHz+52%
ROPs
16+167%
6
TMUs
64+33%
48
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Graphics 540 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AIris Graphics 540
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 540 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 760A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760A and System on the Iris Graphics 540.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AIris Graphics 540
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (Iris Graphics 540). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AIris Graphics 540
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (FL 12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A) vs Quick Sync (Iris Graphics 540). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs Quick Sync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Iris Graphics 540).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AIris Graphics 540
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
Quick Sync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
Quick Sync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,HEVC,VP8
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the Iris Graphics 540's 15W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 540). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AIris Graphics 540
TDP
55W
15W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
—
Perf/Watt
22.3
84.7+280%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760A came in at $249, while the Iris Graphics 540 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 540 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) — the Iris Graphics 540 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Graphics 540 (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AIris Graphics 540
MSRP
$249
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
4.9
Infinity
Codename
GK106
Skylake GT3e
Release
March 17 2014
September 1 2015
Ranking
#813
#808
Search GeForce GTX 760A on AmazonSearch Iris Graphics 540 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.