
GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 6770

GeForce GTX 760A
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 760A is positioned at rank 483 and the Radeon HD 6770 is on rank 127, so the Radeon HD 6770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760A.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 760A holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $129), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 211.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+211.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($129) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon HD 6770

GeForce GTX 760A
The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

Radeon HD 6770
The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the Radeon HD 6770 reaches 1,271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,226 | 1,271+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 800+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS | 1.36 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 900 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 80 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 6770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+7% | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A) vs None (Radeon HD 6770). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 65% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-49% | 108W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 22.3+89% | 11.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129 and now averages $129. The GeForce GTX 760A costs 69% less ($89 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) — the GeForce GTX 760A offers 209.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 760A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $129-48% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-69% | $129 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.6+209% | 9.9 |
| Codename | GK106 | Juniper |
| Release | March 17 2014 | January 21 2011 |
| Ranking | #813 | #807 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












