GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 6770

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

2014Core: 628 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6770

2011Boost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 6770 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 6770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 6770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760A

2014

Why buy it

  • 44.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 55W instead of 108W, a 53W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 93% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6770

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $120 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 100.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 96.4% higher power demand at 108W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 44.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6770 instead at 1,271 vs 1,226, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 100.1% (9.9 vs 4.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760A has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 6770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6770

The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the Radeon HD 6770 reaches 1,271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760ARadeon HD 6770
G3D Mark Score
1,226
1,271+4%
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768
800+4%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.009 TFLOPS
1.36 TFLOPS+35%
Boost Clock
657 MHz
900 MHz+37%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
64+60%
40
L1 Cache
64 KB
80 KB+25%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760ARadeon HD 6770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6770 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760A and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6770.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760ARadeon HD 6770
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760ARadeon HD 6770
DirectX
12 (11_0)+7%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A) vs None (Radeon HD 6770). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760ARadeon HD 6770
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 65% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760ARadeon HD 6770
TDP
55W-49%
108W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
198mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
22.3+89%
11.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760A came in at $249, while the Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6770 was 48.2% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) — the Radeon HD 6770 offers 102% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 760A (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760ARadeon HD 6770
MSRP
$249
$129-48%
Performance per Dollar
4.9
9.9+102%
Codename
GK106
Juniper
Release
March 17 2014
January 21 2011
Ranking
#813
#807

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.