GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760A

2014

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
149% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 12.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

2013

Why buy it

✅31.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 148.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.2 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 31.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 760A instead at 1,226 vs 1,222, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 148.2% (12.2 vs 4.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760A has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
G3D Mark Score	1,226	1,222
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	768

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760A and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
TDP	55W	50W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	22.3	24.4+9%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760A came in at $249, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual was 59.8% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 12.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 149% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 760A (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP	$249	$100-60%
Performance per Dollar	4.9	12.2+149%
Codename	GK106	—
Release	March 17 2014	August 1 2013
Ranking	#813	#881

Search GeForce GTX 760A on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.