Iris Graphics 540 vs Quadro 2000 D
Iris Graphics 540
Popular choices:
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Graphics 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 540 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 540 and Quadro 2000 D
Iris Graphics 540
The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 540 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,270+3% | 1,239 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+60% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Graphics 540 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (Iris Graphics 540) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: Quick Sync vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Iris Graphics 540) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync | — |
| Decoder | Quick Sync | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP8 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 122.1% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-76% | 62W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 178mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.7+324% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Graphics 540 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Iris Graphics 540 costs 100+% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) vs 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Iris Graphics 540 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 540 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 35.4 |
| Codename | Skylake GT3e | GF106 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | October 5 2011 |
| Ranking | #808 | #892 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Graphics 540 and Quadro 2000 D
