Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon R7 A370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon R7 A370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon R7 A370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Graphics 540

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A370

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Graphics 540 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 A370 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,281 vs 1,270), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon R7 A370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Graphics 540

The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.

Radeon R7 A370

The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the Radeon R7 A370 reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 540 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon R7 A370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A370). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon R7 A370
G3D Mark Score	1,270	1,281
Architecture	Generation 9.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm+	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS	1.997 TFLOPS+160%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz+3%	975 MHz
ROPs	6	32+433%
TMUs	48	64+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon R7 A370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Graphics 540 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A370 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 A370 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Graphics 540 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A370.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon R7 A370
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A370's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A370). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon R7 A370
TDP	15W-85%	100W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	84.7+562%	12.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Graphics 540 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 A370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 540 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) vs 8.6 (Radeon R7 A370) — the Iris Graphics 540 offers Infinity% better value.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon R7 A370
MSRP	$0-100%	$149
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	8.6
Codename	Skylake GT3e	Trinidad
Release	September 1 2015	June 18 2015
Ranking	#808	#467

Search Iris Graphics 540 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.