Iris Graphics 540 vs Quadro 4000M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Graphics 540

15

1,270

0.0%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

1,287

+1.3%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000M

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

95%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

93%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

92%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

90%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

89%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

87%

#76

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

918%

#91

Quadro 4000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

95%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

92%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

91%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 4000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Graphics 540.

Insight	Iris Graphics 540	Quadro 4000M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 4000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Graphics 540 Benchmark Check

Quadro 4000M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 540 and Quadro 4000M

Iris Graphics 540

The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 540 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Quadro 4000M
G3D Mark Score	1,270	1,287+1%
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Fermi
Process Node	14 nm+	40 nm
Shading Units	384+14%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS+20%	0.6384 TFLOPS
ROPs	6	32+433%
TMUs	48	56+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Quadro 4000M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Graphics 540 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M has 2 GB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Quadro 4000M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.