Iris Graphics 540
Quadro 4000M
Iris Graphics 540 vs Quadro 4000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Graphics 540 vs Quadro 4000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Graphics 540 vs Quadro 4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Graphics 540
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Graphics 540 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 4000M is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Graphics 540 vs Quadro 4000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Graphics 540
The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.
Quadro 4000M
The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 540 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,270 | 1,287+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+14% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+20% | 0.6384 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 6 | 32+433% |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Graphics 540 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M carries 2 GB. Quadro 4000M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Graphics 540 and 64-bit on the Quadro 4000M.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 84.7+557% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Iris Graphics 540 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Skylake GT3e | GF104 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | February 22 2011 |
| Ranking | #808 | #801 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Graphics 540 and Quadro 4000M
