
Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank 288 and the Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual is on rank 394, so the Quadro 2000 D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $100), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 180.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+180.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
The Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,261 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,261 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,239 | 1,261+2% |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 768+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual has 512 MB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 21.4% difference. The Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W | 50W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 178mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 25.2+26% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $150 and now averages $100. The Quadro 2000 D costs 65% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 12.6 (Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 181% better value. The Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $150-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-65% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4+181% | 12.6 |
| Codename | GF106 | — |
| Release | October 5 2011 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #892 | #881 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















