Radeon HD 6770 vs Quadro 2000 D
Radeon HD 6770
Popular choices:
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6770 is positioned at rank 127 and the Quadro 2000 D is on rank 288, so the Radeon HD 6770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6770
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $129), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 259.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+259.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($129) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6770 and Quadro 2000 D
Radeon HD 6770
The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6770 scores 1,271 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6770 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 6770) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,271+3% | 1,239 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+317% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+183% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 256 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6770 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6770 draws 108W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 54.1% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6770) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 198mm vs 178mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W | 62W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 198mm | 178mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.8 | 20.0+69% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $129, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Quadro 2000 D costs 72.9% less ($94 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) vs 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 257.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-78% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $129 | $35-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 35.4+258% |
| Codename | Juniper | GF106 |
| Release | January 21 2011 | October 5 2011 |
| Ranking | #807 | #892 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6770 and Quadro 2000 D
