Radeon HD 6770M
VS
Quadro 2000D

Radeon HD 6770M vs Quadro 2000D

AMD

Radeon HD 6770M

2011Core: 725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

2011Core: 625 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6770M is positioned at rank 164 and the Quadro 2000D is on rank 311, so the Radeon HD 6770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6770M

#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
98%
#154
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
338%
#156
306%
#157
306%
#161
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
278%
#162
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
276%
#164
Radeon HD 6770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#172
GeForce GT 540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#177
GeForce GTX 860M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
96%
#179
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
96%
#296
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9008%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
100%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
99%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
98%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
96%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
96%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
94%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
93%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
93%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
93%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
92%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
90%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
87%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
87%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
85%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6770M.

InsightRadeon HD 6770MQuadro 2000D
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 2000D remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6770M and Quadro 2000D

AMD

Radeon HD 6770M

The Radeon HD 6770M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 964 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6770M scores 964 and the Quadro 2000D reaches 980 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6770M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro 2000D uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6770M) vs 192 (Quadro 2000D). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770M) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D).

FeatureRadeon HD 6770MQuadro 2000D
G3D Mark Score
964
980+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
480+150%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS+45%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
48 KB
256 KB+433%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6770MQuadro 2000D
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6770M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000D offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 6770MQuadro 2000D
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6770M draws 35W versus the Quadro 2000D's 62W — a 55.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6770M) vs 350W (Quadro 2000D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6770MQuadro 2000D
TDP
35W-44%
62W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
27.5+74%
15.8