Radeon HD 6770M vs Quadro K2000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6770M is positioned at rank 164 and the Quadro K2000M is on rank 58, so the Quadro K2000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6770M

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

100%

#47

Radeon RX 6700S

MSRP: $479|Avg: $300

98%

#154

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

338%

#156

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

306%

#157

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

306%

#161

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

278%

#162

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

276%

#164

Radeon HD 6770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#172

GeForce GT 540M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

98%

#177

GeForce GTX 860M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

96%

#179

Radeon R9 360

MSRP: $99|Avg: $55

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000M

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

100%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

99%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

93%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

92%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

92%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

88%

#43

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

589%

#58

Quadro K2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

100%

#60

Intel Arc Pro A60

MSRP: $380|Avg: $380

100%

#63

T400 4GB

MSRP: $159|Avg: $99

95%

#64

Radeon Pro 5300

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

95%

#69

Radeon Pro W5500

MSRP: $399|Avg: $300

89%

#72

Quadro P2200

MSRP: $429|Avg: $227

87%

#73

T1000

MSRP: $350|Avg: $382

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K2000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6770M.

Insight	Radeon HD 6770M	Quadro K2000M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K2000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 6770M Benchmark Check

Quadro K2000M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6770M and Quadro K2000M

Radeon HD 6770M

The Radeon HD 6770M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 964 points.

Quadro K2000M

The Quadro K2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $265.27.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6770M scores 964 and the Quadro K2000M reaches 1,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6770M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro K2000M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6770M) vs 384 (Quadro K2000M). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770M) vs 0.5722 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000M).

Feature	Radeon HD 6770M	Quadro K2000M
G3D Mark Score	964	1,004+4%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480+25%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.696 TFLOPS+22%	0.5722 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	48 KB+50%	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6770M	Quadro K2000M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6770M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000M has 2 GB. The Quadro K2000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon HD 6770M	Quadro K2000M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6770M draws 35W versus the Quadro K2000M's 55W — a 44.4% difference. The Radeon HD 6770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6770M) vs 350W (Quadro K2000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.