Radeon HD 6870
VS
FirePro V7900

Radeon HD 6870 vs FirePro V7900

AMD

Radeon HD 6870

2010Boost: 900 MHz
VS

FirePro V7900

2011Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7900

#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
93%
#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
92%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
88%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
88%
#264
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6537%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
100%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
98%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
98%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
95%
#285
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
93%
#287
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
92%
#289
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
92%
#290
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
91%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
89%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6870.

InsightRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)
Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (247mm)
Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6870 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6870 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $120), it costs 58% less, resulting in a 134.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+134.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6870 and FirePro V7900

AMD

Radeon HD 6870

The Radeon HD 6870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,206 points. Launch price was $239.

AMD

FirePro V7900

The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6870 scores 2,206 and the FirePro V7900 reaches 2,261 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6870 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro V7900 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 6870) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7900). Raw compute: 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6870) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900).

FeatureRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
G3D Mark Score
2,206
2,261+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 3
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1120
1280+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.016 TFLOPS+9%
1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
80+43%
L1 Cache
224 KB
320 KB+43%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Radeon HD 6870) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7900). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
DirectX
11.0
11.2+2%
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6870) vs None (FirePro V7900). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6870) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900).

FeatureRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
UVD 3.0
UVD 3.1
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6870 draws 151W versus the FirePro V7900's 150W — a 0.7% difference. The FirePro V7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 6870) vs 350W (FirePro V7900). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 247mm vs 279mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 100°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
TDP
151W
150W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
247mm
279mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85-15%
100°C
Perf/Watt
14.6
15.1+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6870 launched at $239 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro V7900 launched at $999 and now averages $120. The Radeon HD 6870 costs 58.3% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.1 (Radeon HD 6870) vs 18.8 (FirePro V7900) — the Radeon HD 6870 offers 134.6% better value. The FirePro V7900 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 6870FirePro V7900
MSRP
$239-76%
$999
Avg Price (30d)
$50-58%
$120
Performance per Dollar
44.1+135%
18.8
Codename
Barts
Cayman
Release
October 21 2010
May 24 2011
Ranking
#661
#656