
Radeon HD 6870

RadeonT 660M
Radeon HD 6870 vs RadeonT 660M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 6870 vs RadeonT 660M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 6870 vs RadeonT 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 6870
2010Why buy it
- ✅34.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌277.5% higher power demand at 151W vs 40W.
RadeonT 660M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 151W, a 111W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6870 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6870 vs RadeonT 660M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6870
The Radeon HD 6870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,206 points. Launch price was $239.

RadeonT 660M
The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6870 scores 2,206 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6870 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 6870) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6870) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6870 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,206 | 2,221 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1120+192% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.016 TFLOPS+38% | 1.459 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1900 MHz+111% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+133% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+75% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6870 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6870 and 64-bit on the RadeonT 660M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6870) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6870 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (Radeon HD 6870) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6870 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_2)+9% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6870) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6870) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6870 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6870 draws 151W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 116.2% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 6870) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6870 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 151W | 40W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 247mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.6 | 55.5+280% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RadeonT 660M (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6870 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $239 | — |
| Codename | Barts | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | October 21 2010 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #661 | #565 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















