Radeon HD 6870 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD

Radeon HD 6870

2010Boost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6870 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6870 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6870 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6870

2010

Why buy it

  • 41.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $239 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 132.3% higher power demand at 151W vs 65W.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Radeon HD 6870 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 65W instead of 151W, a 86W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6870 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6870 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 3200 instead at 2,209 vs 2,206, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 3200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $239, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 20.3% (11.1 vs 9.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 6870 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 6870 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6870

The Radeon HD 6870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,206 points. Launch price was $239.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6870 scores 2,206 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6870 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 6870) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6870) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

FeatureRadeon HD 6870Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score
2,206
2,209
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1120+75%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.016 TFLOPS+46%
1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
224 KB+40%
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6870Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6870 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6870 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200.

FeatureRadeon HD 6870Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Radeon HD 6870) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon HD 6870Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX
11.0
12 (12_0)+9%
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6870) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6870) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

FeatureRadeon HD 6870Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder
None
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder
UVD 3.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6870 draws 151W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 79.6% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 6870) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 247mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 82°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 6870Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP
151W
65W-57%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
247mm
168mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85
82°C-4%
Perf/Watt
14.6
34.0+133%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6870 came in at $239, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 3200 was 16.7% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Radeon HD 6870) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 20.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3200 (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 6870Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP
$239
$199-17%
Performance per Dollar
9.2
11.1+21%
Codename
Barts
Polaris 23
Release
October 21 2010
July 2 2019
Ranking
#661
#659

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.