Radeon HD 6970M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6970M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6970M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6970M

2011

Why buy it

✅14.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Radeon HD 6970M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6970M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6970M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (2,270 vs 2,209), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6970M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 6970M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6970M

The Radeon HD 6970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,270 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6970M scores 2,270 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6970M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6970M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970M) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	Radeon HD 6970M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	2,270+3%	2,209
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	960+50%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.306 TFLOPS	1.385 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	192 KB+20%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6970M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6970M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6970M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200.

Feature	Radeon HD 6970M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6970M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6970M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 6970M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	75W	65W-13%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	82°C
Perf/Watt	30.3	34.0+12%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3200 (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 6970M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	Blackcomb	Polaris 23
Release	January 4 2011	July 2 2019
Ranking	#654	#659

Search Radeon HD 6970M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 3200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.