Radeon HD 7570M vs FirePro M2000
Radeon HD 7570M
Popular choices:
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7570M is positioned at rank 237 and the FirePro M2000 is on rank 323, so the Radeon HD 7570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570M
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7570M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7570M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7570M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7570M holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 229.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7570M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+229.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7570M and FirePro M2000
Radeon HD 7570M
The Radeon HD 7570M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 421 points.
FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7570M scores 421 and the FirePro M2000 reaches 426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7570M is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro M2000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 640 (FirePro M2000). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 421 | 426+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS+113% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 256 KB (FirePro M2000) — the Radeon HD 7570M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7570M draws 100W versus the FirePro M2000's 43W — a 79.7% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 350W (FirePro M2000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 43W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.2 | 9.9+136% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7570M costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.1 (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 8.5 (FirePro M2000) — the Radeon HD 7570M offers 230.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-70% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.1+231% | 8.5 |
| Codename | Wimbledon | Heathrow |
| Release | April 24 2012 | July 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #531 | #710 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7570M and FirePro M2000
