Radeon HD 7570M vs Quadro 410
Radeon HD 7570M
Popular choices:
Quadro 410
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7570M is positioned at rank 237 and the Quadro 410 is on rank 251, so the Radeon HD 7570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7570M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7570M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7570M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7570M holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 64.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7570M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7570M and Quadro 410
Radeon HD 7570M
The Radeon HD 7570M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 421 points.
Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7570M scores 421 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7570M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 421 | 427+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+11% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS+34% | 1.627 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+233% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7570M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 410 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7570M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7570M draws 100W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 0% difference. The Quadro 410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 4.2 | 4.3+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7570M costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.1 (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 17.1 (Quadro 410) — the Radeon HD 7570M offers 64.3% better value. The Quadro 410 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-40% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.1+64% | 17.1 |
| Codename | Wimbledon | GK104 |
| Release | April 24 2012 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #531 | #604 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7570M and Quadro 410
