Radeon HD 7570M vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Radeon HD 7570M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7570M is positioned at rank 237 and the Radeon HD 3850 AGP is on rank 283, so the Radeon HD 7570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3850 AGP is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7570M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7570M | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7570M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7570M holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $130), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 744.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7570M | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+744.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($130) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7570M and Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Radeon HD 7570M
The Radeon HD 7570M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 421 points.
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
The Radeon HD 3850 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7570M scores 421 and the Radeon HD 3850 AGP reaches 432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7570M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 3850 AGP uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3850 AGP).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 421 | 432+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS+24% | 1.761 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7570M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 3850 AGP's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7570M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 230mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.2+27% | 3.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7570M costs 88.5% less ($115 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.1 (Radeon HD 7570M) vs 3.3 (Radeon HD 3850 AGP) — the Radeon HD 7570M offers 751.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $130 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-88% | $130 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.1+752% | 3.3 |
| Codename | Wimbledon | Pitcairn |
| Release | April 24 2012 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #531 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7570M and Radeon HD 3850 AGP
