Radeon HD 7750 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 64.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7750 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7750 scores 1,703 and the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750) vs 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,703 | 1,726+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS | 0.8333 TFLOPS+2% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7750 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 72 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7750 draws 55W versus the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 7750) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 50W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-29% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 34.5+11% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 7750 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.8 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 64.6% better value. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-46% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+65% | 34.5 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GK107 |
| Release | February 15 2012 | November 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #731 | #925 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7750 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
