Radeon HD 7750 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Iris Plus Graphics 655 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7750 and Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7750 scores 1,703 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,703 | 1,729+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS+2% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | 1050 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7750 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 72 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7750 draws 55W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 7750) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 15W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-29% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 115.3+272% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.8 (Radeon HD 7750) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Release | February 15 2012 | April 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #731 | #723 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7750 and Iris Plus Graphics 655
