
Radeon HD 7750 vs FirePro W600

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:

FirePro W600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W600.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7750 and FirePro W600

Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7750 scores 1,703 and the FirePro W600 reaches 1,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W600 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 512 (FirePro W600). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,703 | 1,695 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS+7% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7750 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W600 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750) vs 12 (FirePro W600). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750) vs H.264 (FirePro W600).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7750 draws 55W versus the FirePro W600's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 7750) vs 350W (FirePro W600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-27% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+37% | 22.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro W600 launched at $599 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.8 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 56.5 (FirePro W600) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 0.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-82% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8 | 56.5 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Cape Verde |
| Release | February 15 2012 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #731 | #732 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












