
Radeon HD 7800-serie vs FirePro W8000

Radeon HD 7800-serie
Popular choices:

FirePro W8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7800-serie.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7800-serie | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7800-serie offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7800-serie holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $1,599), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2421.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7800-serie | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2421.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7800-serie and FirePro W8000

Radeon HD 7800-serie
The Radeon HD 7800-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,029 points. Launch price was $349.

FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 7800-serie scores 4,029 versus the FirePro W8000's 4,259 — the FirePro W8000 leads by 5.7%. The Radeon HD 7800-serie is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7800-serie | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,029 | 4,259+6% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1792+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.56 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+26% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 448 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7800-serie | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7800-serie comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8000 has 4 GB. The FirePro W8000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7800-serie | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7800-serie draws 200W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7800-serie is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7800-serie | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 58°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.1+6% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7800-serie launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 and now averages $1599. The Radeon HD 7800-serie costs 96.2% less ($1539 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.2 (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 2.7 (FirePro W8000) — the Radeon HD 7800-serie offers 2388.9% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7800-serie | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-78% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-96% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.2+2389% | 2.7 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Tahiti |
| Release | March 5 2012 | June 14 2012 |
| Ranking | #460 | #481 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















