Radeon HD 7800-serie
VS
Quadro M2000

Radeon HD 7800-serie vs Quadro M2000

AMD

Radeon HD 7800-serie

2012Core: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M2000

2016Core: 796 MHzBoost: 1163 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7800-serie is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 7800-serieQuadro M2000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $60), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 19.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 7800-serieQuadro M2000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+19.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7800-serie and Quadro M2000

AMD

Radeon HD 7800-serie

The Radeon HD 7800-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,029 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7800-serie scores 4,029 and the Quadro M2000 reaches 4,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7800-serie is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000).

FeatureRadeon HD 7800-serieQuadro M2000
G3D Mark Score
4,029
4,026
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+67%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.56 TFLOPS+43%
1.786 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+67%
48
L1 Cache
320 KB+11%
288 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7800-serieQuadro M2000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7800-serie comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000 has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7800-serieQuadro M2000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7800-serie draws 200W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 7800-serieQuadro M2000
TDP
200W
75W-63%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
167mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
20.1
53.7+167%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7800-serie launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0 and now averages $50. The Quadro M2000 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.2 (Radeon HD 7800-serie) vs 80.5 (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers 19.8% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7800-serieQuadro M2000
MSRP
$349
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$60
$50-17%
Performance per Dollar
67.2
80.5+20%
Codename
Pitcairn
GM206
Release
March 5 2012
April 8 2016
Ranking
#460
#491