Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X vs Arc Graphics 140V
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2013). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (275mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 661.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+661.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X and Arc Graphics 140V
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X scores 5,248 and the Arc Graphics 140V reaches 5,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Arc Graphics 140V uses Xe², both on 28 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140V). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,248+2% | 5,168 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Xe² |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+25500% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2050 MHz+105% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 264 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X draws 200W versus the Arc Graphics 140V's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140V). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 275mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 275mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.2 | 344.5+1215% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 and now averages $300. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 131.2 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 662.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-15% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-87% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 131.2+663% | 17.2 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | October 8 2013 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #404 | #434 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X and Arc Graphics 140V
