Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
VS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

AMD

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
123%
#8
111%
#9
111%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
101%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
100%
#15
100%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X.

InsightRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (275mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

AMD

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X scores 5,248 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1417 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
5,248
5,310+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+167%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS+88%
2.177 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1417 MHz+42%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+167%
48
L1 Cache
512 KB+78%
288 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 264 GB/s (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — a 135.7% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
264 GB/s+136%
112 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design).

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder
UVD 3.2
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
TDP
200W
75W-63%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
275mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80 C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
26.2
70.8+170%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280XGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSRP
$299
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
Tahiti
GP107
Release
October 8 2013
January 3 2018
Ranking
#404
#429