Radeon HD 8650G vs Radeon R5 M315

AMD

Radeon HD 8650G

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M315

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 8650G vs Radeon R5 M315 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8650G vs Radeon R5 M315 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8650G vs Radeon R5 M315: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8650G

2012

Why buy it

  • 69.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 207.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M315

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8650G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8650G is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 69.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (501 vs 489), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 8650G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8650G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 207.4% (10.0 vs 3.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 8650G vs Radeon R5 M315 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 8650G

The Radeon HD 8650G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 501 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon R5 M315

The Radeon R5 M315 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8650G scores 501 and the Radeon R5 M315 reaches 489 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8650G is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M315 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M315). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M315). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M315
G3D Mark Score
501+2%
489
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024+220%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.761 TFLOPS+167%
0.6592 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1030 MHz+3%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
64+220%
20
L1 Cache
256 KB+220%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M315
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8650G and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M315. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M315) — the Radeon HD 8650G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M315
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8650G draws 130W versus the Radeon R5 M315's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M315 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M315). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M315
TDP
130W
75W-42%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Perf/Watt
3.9
6.5+67%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 8650G came in at $50, while the Radeon R5 M315 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8650G was 66.7% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 3.3 (Radeon R5 M315) — the Radeon HD 8650G offers 203% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M315 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M315
MSRP
$50-67%
$150
Performance per Dollar
10.0+203%
3.3
Codename
Pitcairn
Jet
Release
March 5 2012
May 15 2016
Ranking
#503
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.