Radeon HD 8650G
VS
Radeon R5 M420

Radeon HD 8650G vs Radeon R5 M420

AMD

Radeon HD 8650G

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M420

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8650G is positioned at rank 125 and the Radeon R5 M420 is on rank 663, so the Radeon HD 8650G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
724%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
696%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
687%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
686%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
685%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
681%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
672%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
670%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
664%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
662%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
654%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
652%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
641%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
640%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
94%
#110
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
798%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
99%
#127
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
98%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
97%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
97%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
96%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
94%
#136
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
94%
#137
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
94%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
92%
#140
Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M420

#652
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6463%
#654
5858%
#655
5843%
#659
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
5313%
#660
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
5277%
#662
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#663
Radeon R5 M420
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#664
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#665
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
98%
#666
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
98%
#667
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#668
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#669
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
98%
#670
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
90%
#671
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
90%
#672
89%
#673
GeForce 505
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
86%
#674
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
86%
#675
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
85%
#676
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
85%
#677
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 M420 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8650G.

InsightRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M420
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 8650G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8650G holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $300), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 496.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M420
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+496.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8650G and Radeon R5 M420

AMD

Radeon HD 8650G

The Radeon HD 8650G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 501 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon R5 M420

The Radeon R5 M420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8650G scores 501 and the Radeon R5 M420 reaches 504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8650G is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M420 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 768 (Radeon R5 M420). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M420). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M420
G3D Mark Score
501
504
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024+33%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.761 TFLOPS+15%
1.536 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+33%
48
L1 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M420
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 M420) — the Radeon HD 8650G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M420
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8650G draws 130W versus the Radeon R5 M420's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M420). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M420
TDP
130W
75W-42%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
3.9
6.7+72%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8650G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R5 M420 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon HD 8650G costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.0 (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 1.7 (Radeon R5 M420) — the Radeon HD 8650G offers 488.2% better value. The Radeon R5 M420 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 8650GRadeon R5 M420
MSRP
$50-83%
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$50-83%
$300
Performance per Dollar
10.0+488%
1.7
Codename
Pitcairn
Emerald
Release
March 5 2012
May 15 2016
Ranking
#503
#649