Radeon HD 8650G vs Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon HD 8650G
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M265DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8650G is positioned at rank 125 and the Radeon R7 M265DX is on rank 564, so the Radeon HD 8650G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M265DX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8650G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M265DX.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M265DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M265DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8650G and Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon HD 8650G
The Radeon HD 8650G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 501 points. Launch price was $249.
Radeon R7 M265DX
The Radeon R7 M265DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8650G scores 501 and the Radeon R7 M265DX reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8650G is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M265DX uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 896 (Radeon R7 M265DX).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 501 | 499 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+14% | 896 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8650G draws 130W versus the Radeon R7 M265DX's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M265DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265DX). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9 | 6.7+72% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8650G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R7 M265DX launched at $149 and now averages $40. The Radeon R7 M265DX costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.0 (Radeon HD 8650G) vs 12.5 (Radeon R7 M265DX) — the Radeon R7 M265DX offers 25% better value. The Radeon R7 M265DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-66% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 12.5+25% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | — |
| Release | March 5 2012 | June 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #503 | #800 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8650G and Radeon R7 M265DX
