
Radeon HD 8670M vs Quadro FX 5600

Radeon HD 8670M
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8670M is positioned at rank 272 and the Quadro FX 5600 is on rank 407, so the Radeon HD 8670M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 5600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8670M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8670M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 5600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8670M and Quadro FX 5600

Radeon HD 8670M
The Radeon HD 8670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points.

Quadro FX 5600
The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8670M scores 520 and the Quadro FX 5600 reaches 525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8670M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 5600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5600). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 520 | 525 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+433% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS+270% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8670M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5600 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 5600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5600) — the Radeon HD 8670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8670M draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 5600's 189W — a 61.6% difference. The Radeon HD 8670M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8670M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-47% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 5.2+86% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8670M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670M | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Neptune | GT200B |
| Release | May 14 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #507 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















