Radeon HD 8690M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8690M is positioned at rank 247 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is on rank 85, so the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8690M

#237

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

552%

#239

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

500%

#240

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

499%

#244

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

454%

#245

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

450%

#247

Radeon HD 8690M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#252

GeForce 720A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

98%

#253

GeForce GT 520M

MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A

96%

#254

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $60

96%

#257

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

95%

#262

GeForce 945A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

355%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

341%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

337%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

337%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

336%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

334%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

330%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

329%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

326%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

325%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

321%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

320%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

315%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

314%

#70

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

392%

#79

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

71%

#80

GeForce RTX 5090

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700

71%

#81

Moore Threads MTT S80

MSRP: $260|Avg: $170

68%

#85

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#86

Radeon R5 A6-7480

MSRP: $35|Avg: $30

98%

#87

GeForce GT 710

MSRP: $35|Avg: $50

87%

#89

GeForce GT 740

MSRP: $89|Avg: $89

79%

#90

Radeon R7 A8-7680

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

78%

#92

Radeon HD 7730

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

76%

#93

Radeon 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

72%

#97

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

70%

#98

GeForce GT 1010

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

68%

#99

Radeon R7 430

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

68%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8690M.

Insight	Radeon HD 8690M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 8690M Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8690M and Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Radeon HD 8690M

The Radeon HD 8690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 984 points.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8690M scores 984 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8690M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon HD 8690M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

Feature	Radeon HD 8690M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score	984	1,000+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	384+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8690M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon HD 8690M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon HD 8690M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon HD 8690M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
DirectX	12	12_0
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8690M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Radeon HD 8690M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 3	UVD 4.2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8690M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8690M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.