
GeForce GT 1010

Radeon HD 8690M
GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon HD 8690M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon HD 8690M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon HD 8690M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 1010
2021Why buy it
- ✅8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Radeon HD 8690M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 1010 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌14600% longer card at 147mm vs 1mm.
Radeon HD 8690M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 147mm, a 146mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 1010 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon HD 8690M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 1010
The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

Radeon HD 8690M
The Radeon HD 8690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 984 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Radeon HD 8690M reaches 984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8690M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 320 (Radeon HD 8690M). Raw compute: 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010) vs 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690M). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 972 | 984+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 320+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7516 TFLOPS+42% | 0.528 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+78% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 20+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 80 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 1010 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8690M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1010 and System on the Radeon HD 8690M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 1010) vs 128 KB (Radeon HD 8690M) — the GeForce GT 1010 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 12 (Radeon HD 8690M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8690M). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP8 (Feature Set H) | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8690M's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 1010 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8690M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 147mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 147mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.4+64% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 1010 (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | — |
| Codename | GP108 | Sun |
| Release | January 13 2021 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #895 | #891 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














