GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro K2000M
GeForce GT 1010
Popular choices:
Quadro K2000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 1010 is positioned at rank 98 and the Quadro K2000M is on rank 58, so the Quadro K2000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 1010
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 1010 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The GeForce GT 1010 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 1010.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K2000M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $70 for the GeForce GT 1010, it costs 57% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 141% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+141%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 1010 and Quadro K2000M
GeForce GT 1010
The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.
Quadro K2000M
The Quadro K2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $265.27.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Quadro K2000M reaches 1,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K2000M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 384 (Quadro K2000M). Raw compute: 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010) vs 0.5722 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 972 | 1,004+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7516 TFLOPS+31% | 0.5722 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 1010 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000M has 2 GB. The Quadro K2000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 11.1 (11_0) (Quadro K2000M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+8% | 11.1 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs NVENC (Quadro K2000M). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 1010) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC |
| Decoder | VP8 (Feature Set H) | PureVideo HD (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Quadro K2000M's 55W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce GT 1010 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Quadro K2000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-45% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.4+77% | 18.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000M costs 57.1% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 33.5 (Quadro K2000M) — the Quadro K2000M offers 141% better value. The GeForce GT 1010 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70 | $30-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9 | 33.5+141% |
| Codename | GP108 | GK107 |
| Release | January 13 2021 | June 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #895 | #886 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 1010 and Quadro K2000M
