GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 A265

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 1010

2021Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R7 A265

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 A265 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 1010

0.5 GB 30

972

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon R7 A265

0.5 GB 30

994

+2.3%

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Radeon RX 7600M

Radeon RX 6700S

Radeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 A265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 1010

2021

Why buy it

✅8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 108.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Radeon R7 A265 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 1010 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon R7 A265

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 1010 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
112.9% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 1010 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 A265 instead at 994 vs 972, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 1010 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 1010 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $79 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 108.1% (13.9 vs 6.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 1010

The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Radeon R7 A265 reaches 994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Radeon R7 A265
G3D Mark Score	972	994+2%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7516 TFLOPS+19%	0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1468 MHz+78%	825 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	16	24+50%
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 1010 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A265 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Radeon R7 A265
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1010 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Radeon R7 A265
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 A265). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Radeon R7 A265
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A265). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 1010) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 A265).

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Radeon R7 A265
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	VP8 (Feature Set H)	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Radeon R7 A265
TDP	30W	30W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	147mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	75
Perf/Watt	32.4	33.1+2%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 1010 came in at $70, while the Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GT 1010 was 53% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) — the GeForce GT 1010 offers 107.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 1010 (2021 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Radeon R7 A265
MSRP	$70-53%	$149
Performance per Dollar	13.9+107%	6.7
Codename	GP108	Opal
Release	January 13 2021	January 9 2014
Ranking	#895	#890

Search GeForce GT 1010 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A265 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.