GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro 2000

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1010

2021Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000

2010Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro 2000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro 2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 1010

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $529 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 777.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Quadro 2000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 1010 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 62W, a 32W reduction.
  • Measures 147mm instead of 178mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro 2000

2010

Why buy it

  • 5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 755.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • 106.7% higher power demand at 62W vs 30W.
  • 21.1% longer card at 178mm vs 147mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 2000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 1010 instead at 972 vs 948, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 1010 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 1010 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $529 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 777.4% (13.9 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro 2000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro 2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1010

The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Quadro 2000 reaches 948 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Quadro 2000
G3D Mark Score
972+3%
948
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
256+33%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7516 TFLOPS+57%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
32 KB
256 KB+700%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 1010 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Quadro 2000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 1010 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 carries 1 GB. Quadro 2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1010 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Quadro 2000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 11_0 (Quadro 2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Quadro 2000
DirectX
12 (12_1)+9%
11_0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs VP4.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Quadro 2000
Encoder
None
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
VP8 (Feature Set H)
VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 69.6% difference. The GeForce GT 1010 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 147mm vs 178mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Quadro 2000
TDP
30W-52%
62W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
147mm
178mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
32.4+112%
15.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 1010 came in at $70, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GT 1010 was 88.3% cheaper ($529 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 1.6 (Quadro 2000) — the GeForce GT 1010 offers 768.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 1010 (2021 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Quadro 2000
MSRP
$70-88%
$599
Performance per Dollar
13.9+769%
1.6
Codename
GP108
GF106
Release
January 13 2021
December 24 2010
Ranking
#895
#902

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.