
GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro 2000

GeForce GT 1010
Popular choices:

Quadro 2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 1010 is positioned at rank 98 and the Quadro 2000 is on rank 314, so the GeForce GT 1010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 1010
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 1010 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2010). The GeForce GT 1010 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 1010 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $70 for the GeForce GT 1010, it costs 64% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 173.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+173.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 1010 and Quadro 2000

GeForce GT 1010
The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Quadro 2000 reaches 948 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 972+3% | 948 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256+33% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7516 TFLOPS+57% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 1010 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 has 1 GB. The Quadro 2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 11_0 (Quadro 2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs VP4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | VP8 (Feature Set H) | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 69.6% difference. The GeForce GT 1010 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 147mm vs 178mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-52% | 62W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 147mm | 178mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.4+112% | 15.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 1010 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599 and now averages $25. The Quadro 2000 costs 64.3% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 37.9 (Quadro 2000) — the Quadro 2000 offers 172.7% better value. The GeForce GT 1010 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-88% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70 | $25-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9 | 37.9+173% |
| Codename | GP108 | GF106 |
| Release | January 13 2021 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #895 | #902 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











