
GeForce GT 1010

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 1010
2021Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 1010 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$70 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
2014Why buy it
- ✅89.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 1010
The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 972 | 1,000+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 1010 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1010 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VP8 (Feature Set H) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 147mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 147mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.4 | 33.3+3% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 1010 came in at $70, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) was 30% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 46.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 1010 (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | $49-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9 | 20.4+47% |
| Codename | GP108 | Kaveri Spectre |
| Release | January 13 2021 | January 14 2014 |
| Ranking | #895 | #865 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














