GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1010

2021Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 1010

2021

Why buy it

  • Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 1010 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 42.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $70 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

  • 89.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $21 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • Delivers 47% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 89.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (1,000 vs 972), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 1010 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $70, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 47% (20.4 vs 13.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 1010 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1010

The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score
972
1,000+3%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
384+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 1010 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1010 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12_0
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Encoder
None
VCE 2.0
Decoder
VP8 (Feature Set H)
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 147mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP
30W
30W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
147mm
0mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
32.4
33.3+3%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 1010 came in at $70, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) was 30% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 46.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 1010 (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GT 1010Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP
$70
$49-30%
Performance per Dollar
13.9
20.4+47%
Codename
GP108
Kaveri Spectre
Release
January 13 2021
January 14 2014
Ranking
#895
#865

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.