GeForce GT 1010 vs Radeon R9 M375
GeForce GT 1010
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 1010 is positioned at rank 98 and the Radeon R9 M375 is on rank 565, so the GeForce GT 1010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 1010
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 1010 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The GeForce GT 1010 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M375 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 1010.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 1010 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $70 versus $300 for the Radeon R9 M375, it costs 77% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 317.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+317.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($70) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 1010 and Radeon R9 M375
GeForce GT 1010
The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.
Radeon R9 M375
The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Radeon R9 M375 reaches 998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375). Raw compute: 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1015 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 972 | 998+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 640+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7516 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+45% | 1015 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 1010 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M375 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 11_1 (Radeon R9 M375). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+9% | 11_1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M375). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 1010) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 M375).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VP8 (Feature Set H) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M375's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 1010 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 147mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.4+144% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 1010 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The GeForce GT 1010 costs 76.7% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) — the GeForce GT 1010 offers 321.2% better value. The GeForce GT 1010 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-77% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70-77% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9+321% | 3.3 |
| Codename | GP108 | Tropo |
| Release | January 13 2021 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #895 | #889 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 1010 and Radeon R9 M375
