Radeon HD 8690M vs Radeon R7 A265

AMD

Radeon HD 8690M

2013Core: 775 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A265

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 8690M vs Radeon R7 A265 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8690M vs Radeon R7 A265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8690M vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8690M

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A265

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A265 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (994 vs 984), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 8690M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A265 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A265 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 8690M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 8690M vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 8690M

The Radeon HD 8690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 984 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8690M scores 984 and the Radeon R7 A265 reaches 994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8690M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon HD 8690M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 825 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8690MRadeon R7 A265
G3D Mark Score
984
994+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
384+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.528 TFLOPS
0.6336 TFLOPS+20%
Boost Clock
825 MHz
825 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
20
24+20%
L1 Cache
80 KB
96 KB+20%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8690MRadeon R7 A265
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 8690M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon HD 8690M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A265) — the Radeon R7 A265 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8690MRadeon R7 A265
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon HD 8690M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 A265). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 8690MRadeon R7 A265
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Max Displays
0
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8690M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A265). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.0.

FeatureRadeon HD 8690MRadeon R7 A265
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8690M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8690M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 8690MRadeon R7 A265
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
19.7
33.1+68%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 A265 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 8690MRadeon R7 A265
MSRP
$149
Codename
Sun
Opal
Release
March 1 2013
January 9 2014
Ranking
#891
#890

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.