Radeon HD 8950 vs Quadro M620
Radeon HD 8950
Popular choices:
Quadro M620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M620.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $499), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1116.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1116.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($499) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8950 and Quadro M620
Radeon HD 8950
The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.
Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8950 scores 2,828 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8950 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 977 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828+3% | 2,758 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+250% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.867 TFLOPS+187% | 1 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+28% | 977 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+75% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8950 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M620 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8950 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 8950) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 12_1 (Quadro M620). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8950) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8950 draws 200W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 8950) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 91.9+552% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8950 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $499, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Quadro M620 costs 92% less ($459 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 69.0 (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers 1110.5% better value. The Quadro M620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $499 | $40-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | 69.0+1111% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GM107 |
| Release | January 31 2012 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #454 | #606 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8950 and Quadro M620
