Radeon HD 8950
VS
Radeon R9 M380

Radeon HD 8950 vs Radeon R9 M380

AMD

Radeon HD 8950

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380

#369
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1184%
#371
1073%
#372
1070%
#376
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
973%
#377
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
967%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
96%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
95%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
94%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
93%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
92%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M380 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $300 (vs $499), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 61.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+61.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($499)
More affordable ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8950 and Radeon R9 M380

AMD

Radeon HD 8950

The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8950 scores 2,828 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8950 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score
2,828+3%
2,752
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792+133%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS+87%
1.536 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1250 MHz+25%
1000 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+133%
48
L1 Cache
448 KB+133%
192 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8950 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M380 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 8950) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon HD 8950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
96 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
DirectX
12_0
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8950) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 6.0.

FeatureRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 3.1
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8950 draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 8950) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
TDP
200W
75W-63%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
Mobile
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
14.1
36.7+160%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8950 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $499, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon R9 M380 costs 39.9% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon R9 M380 offers 61.4% better value. The Radeon R9 M380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 8950Radeon R9 M380
MSRP
$499
$300-40%
Avg Price (30d)
$499
$300-40%
Performance per Dollar
5.7
9.2+61%
Codename
Tahiti
Strato
Release
January 31 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#454
#607