
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 690
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is positioned at rank #264 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 690 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 690 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 690 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $75), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and GeForce GTX 690

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

GeForce GTX 690
The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 690 reaches 5,536 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is built on GCN while the GeForce GTX 690 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1019 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,536 |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072 ×2+20% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1019 MHz+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 690 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 192.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 690) — a 25.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 690. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s x2 | 192.2 GB/s x2+25% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 256-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 690's 300W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 650W (GeForce GTX 690). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-33% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5+49% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX 690 launched at $999 and now averages $45. The GeForce GTX 690 costs 40% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 73.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 123.0 (GeForce GTX 690) — the GeForce GTX 690 offers 67.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-70% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | $45-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.3 | 123.0+68% |
| Codename | Neptune CF | GK104 |
| Release | May 1 2012 | May 3 2012 |
| Ranking | #350 | #414 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















