Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire vs Radeon 760M
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is positioned at rank 264 and the Radeon 760M is on rank 294, so the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 760M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2012). The Radeon 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and Radeon 760M
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is built on GCN while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,449 |
| Architecture | GCN | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+400% | 512 |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 2599 MHz+189% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s x2 | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire draws 200W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5 | 363.3+1221% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | — |
| Codename | Neptune CF | Phoenix |
| Release | May 1 2012 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #350 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and Radeon 760M
