
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire vs GRID M60-8A

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:

GRID M60-8A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is positioned at rank 264 and the GRID M60-8A is on rank 280, so the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-8A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-8A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire holds the technical lead. Priced at $75 (vs $120), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 59.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and GRID M60-8A

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

GRID M60-8A
The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire scores 5,500 and the GRID M60-8A reaches 5,523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is built on GCN while the GRID M60-8A uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8A). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,523 |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1178 MHz+31% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire draws 200W versus the GRID M60-8A's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 350W (GRID M60-8A). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5+12% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GRID M60-8A launched at $2500 and now averages $120. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire costs 37.5% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 73.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 46.0 (GRID M60-8A) — the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers 59.3% better value. The GRID M60-8A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-88% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-38% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.3+59% | 46.0 |
| Codename | Neptune CF | GM204 |
| Release | May 1 2012 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #350 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















