Radeon HD 8970M
VS
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

Radeon HD 8970M vs GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

AMD

Radeon HD 8970M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8970M is positioned at rank 78 and the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is on rank 66, so the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M

#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
92%
#68
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
224%
#70
203%
#71
203%
#75
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
184%
#76
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
183%
#78
Radeon HD 8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170
100%
#82
Arc 7-Core iGPU
MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A
97%
#87
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
94%
#92
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
98%
#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
94%
#56
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
207%
#58
188%
#59
188%
#63
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
171%
#64
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
169%
#66
100%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#78
Radeon HD 8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8970M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8970M.

InsightRadeon HD 8970MGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $170 for the Radeon HD 8970M, it costs 71% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 244.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 8970MGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+244.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8970M and GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

AMD

Radeon HD 8970M

The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8970M scores 3,876 and the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design reaches 3,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8970M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1417 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8970MGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
3,876
3,925+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1280+67%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.304 TFLOPS+6%
2.177 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1417 MHz+57%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+67%
48
L1 Cache
320 KB+11%
288 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8970MGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8970MGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
80 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8970M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 8970MGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
38.8
52.3+35%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design costs 70.6% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers 244.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 8970MGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Avg Price (30d)
$170
$50-71%
Performance per Dollar
22.8
78.5+244%
Codename
Neptune
GP107
Release
May 14 2013
January 3 2018
Ranking
#507
#429