
Radeon HD 8970M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Radeon HD 8970M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8970M is positioned at rank #78 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8970M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $170), it costs 76% less, resulting in a 327.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+327.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8970M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Radeon HD 8970M
The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8970M scores 3,876 and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti reaches 3,900 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8970M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,876 | 3,900 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS+66% | 1.389 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1085 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 86.4 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8970M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65 |
| Perf/Watt | 38.8 | 52.0+34% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti costs 76.5% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 97.5 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 327.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $40-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.8 | 97.5+328% |
| Codename | Neptune | GM107 |
| Release | May 14 2013 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #507 | #501 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















