
Radeon HD 8970M vs GRID P6-2Q

Radeon HD 8970M
Popular choices:

GRID P6-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8970M is positioned at rank 78 and the GRID P6-2Q is on rank 296, so the Radeon HD 8970M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8970M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P6-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P6-2Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $170), it costs 12% less, resulting in a 14.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8970M and GRID P6-2Q

Radeon HD 8970M
The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.

GRID P6-2Q
The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8970M scores 3,876 and the GRID P6-2Q reaches 3,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8970M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P6-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,876 | 3,926+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+109% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1178 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8970M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-2Q has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8970M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8970M draws 100W versus the GRID P6-2Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon HD 8970M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 350W (GRID P6-2Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 38.8+123% | 17.4 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P6-2Q costs 11.8% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 26.2 (GRID P6-2Q) — the GRID P6-2Q offers 14.9% better value. The GRID P6-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $150-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.8 | 26.2+15% |
| Codename | Neptune | GM204 |
| Release | May 14 2013 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #507 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















