
Radeon HD 8970M vs Radeon 680M

Radeon HD 8970M
Popular choices:

Radeon 680M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8970M is positioned at rank 78 and the Radeon 680M is on rank 331, so the Radeon HD 8970M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 680M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 680M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon 680M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8970M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8970M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 680M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 680M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $170 for the Radeon HD 8970M, it costs 53% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 110.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+110.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8970M and Radeon 680M

Radeon HD 8970M
The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.

Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8970M scores 3,876 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8970M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,876+1% | 3,836 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS | 3.379 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 2200 MHz+144% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8970M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8970M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8970M draws 100W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 38.8 | 76.7+98% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 680M costs 52.9% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (Radeon HD 8970M) vs 48.0 (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon 680M offers 110.5% better value. The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $80-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.8 | 48.0+111% |
| Codename | Neptune | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | May 14 2013 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #507 | #512 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















