Radeon HD4670 vs Quadro FX 2700M
Radeon HD4670
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 2700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD4670 is positioned at rank 216 and the Quadro FX 2700M is on rank 237, so the Radeon HD4670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD4670
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 2700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD4670.
| Insight | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 2700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD4670 and Quadro FX 2700M
Radeon HD4670
The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.
Quadro FX 2700M
The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD4670 scores 366 and the Quadro FX 2700M reaches 367 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 2700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD4670) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700M). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700M).
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 366 | 367 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+540% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+334% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD4670) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 2700M) — the Radeon HD4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD4670 draws 250W versus the Quadro FX 2700M's 189W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 2700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD4670) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 189W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 1.9+27% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD4670 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | Cayman | GT200B |
| Release | December 14 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #596 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD4670 and Quadro FX 2700M
