Radeon HD4670 vs Quadro FX 3700
Radeon HD4670
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 3700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD4670 is positioned at rank 216 and the Quadro FX 3700 is on rank 401, so the Radeon HD4670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD4670
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD4670.
| Insight | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD4670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD4670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $500), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3179.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3179.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD4670 and Quadro FX 3700
Radeon HD4670
The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.
Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD4670 scores 366 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD4670) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700).
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 366 | 372+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+540% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+334% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD4670) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3700) — the Radeon HD4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD4670 draws 250W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 3700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD4670) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 189W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 2.0+33% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD4670 costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.4 (Radeon HD4670) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) — the Radeon HD4670 offers 3385.7% better value. The Radeon HD4670 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-96% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-97% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4+3386% | 0.7 |
| Codename | Cayman | GT200B |
| Release | December 14 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #596 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD4670 and Quadro FX 3700
