
Radeon HD4670 vs Radeon HD 7620G

Radeon HD4670
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7620G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD4670 is positioned at rank 216 and the Radeon HD 7620G is on rank 415, so the Radeon HD4670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD4670
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7620G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD4670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7620G.
| Insight | Radeon HD4670 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7620G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7620G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD4670 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+46.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD4670 and Radeon HD 7620G

Radeon HD4670
The Radeon HD4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon HD 7620G
The Radeon HD 7620G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD4670 scores 366 and the Radeon HD 7620G reaches 357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 7620G uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD4670) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7620G). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4670) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7620G).
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 366+3% | 357 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+220% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+369% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+300% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD4670) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7620G) — the Radeon HD4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD4670 draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 7620G's 45W — a 139% difference. The Radeon HD 7620G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD4670) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7620G). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 45W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 7.9+427% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 7620G launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 7620G costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.4 (Radeon HD4670) vs 35.7 (Radeon HD 7620G) — the Radeon HD 7620G offers 46.3% better value. The Radeon HD 7620G is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD4670 | Radeon HD 7620G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67 | $50-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 35.7+46% |
| Codename | Cayman | Turks |
| Release | December 14 2010 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #596 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















