Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs FirePro W7000
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:
FirePro W7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is positioned at rank 24 and the FirePro W7000 is on rank 223, so the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | FirePro W7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and FirePro W7000
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.
FirePro W7000
The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU scores 4,403 and the FirePro W7000 reaches 4,304 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the FirePro W7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 1,280 (FirePro W7000). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | FirePro W7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,403+2% | 4,304 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+220% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+405% | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+220% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+223% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | FirePro W7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7000 has 4 GB. The FirePro W7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | FirePro W7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU draws 300W versus the FirePro W7000's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro W7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 350W (FirePro W7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | FirePro W7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 150W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 28.7+95% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | FirePro W7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Pitcairn |
| Release | June 27 2017 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #474 | #477 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and FirePro W7000
