Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs GRID P6-4Q
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:
GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is positioned at rank 24 and the GRID P6-4Q is on rank 280, so the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU.
| Insight | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P6-4Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and GRID P6-4Q
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.
GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU scores 4,403 and the GRID P6-4Q reaches 4,429 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the GRID P6-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,403 | 4,429 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+167% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+454% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+167% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+79% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU draws 300W versus the GRID P6-4Q's 100W — a 100% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 350W (GRID P6-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 100W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 44.3+201% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GM204 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #474 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and GRID P6-4Q
